skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Jarape Forense "TESTIGO EXPERTO (PERITO)"
A todos los vínculos de este blog se puede acceder gratis vía Google o Yahoo. All the links in this blog can be freely accessed through Google or Yahoo.
A página principal
Archivo del blog
Datos personales
Buscar - Search
Música
Seguidores
ARTICULOS / PAPERS
- "Bowel quaking pessimism": An ethnographic examination of competence and complaining in the forensic community (Michelle McNabb y José Pepe Cabara)
- "Now that you are under oath, how do you feel?" (Geoffrey Hichborn)
- “Cannot Decide”: The fine line between appropriate inconclusive determinations versus unjustifiably deciding not to decide (Itiel E. Dror y Glenn Langenburg) [J. Forensic Science, 2018]
- Being sued (William H. Reid) [Jrnl. Prac. Psych. and Behav. Hlth, 1999]
- Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science (Gianni Ribeiro et al) [Forensic, Sci. International, 2019]
- Challenges in explaining DNA evidence to jurors: A defense attorney's point of view (Edward J. Ungvarsky)
- Chemist in the courtroom (Robert D. Athey, Jr)
- Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (Glinda Cooper y Vanessa Meterko) [Forensic Sci. International, 2019]
- Cognitive effects and cognition of forensic experts (Itiel Dror)
- Commentary on: Dror IG, Langenburg G. “Cannot decide”: The fine line between appropriate inconclusive determinations versus unjustifiably deciding not to decide (Alex Biedermann et al) [J. Forensic Sciences, 2018]
- Communication results for forensic analysts. A course by the President´s DNA Iniciative
- Controlling speech anxiety: Academic recommendations and forensic applications (Roberts Littlefield et al)
- Credibility problem. Are we analysts or investigators?. Do we understand our job? (Peter Barnett) Presentation. NFSTC
- Cross-examination of opposing expert witness (Neil G. Galatz)
- Cross-examination questions (and answers) about your advertising (Rosalie Hamilton)
- Cuando debes probar lo que dices, muchas veces esto te puede condenar. Comentarios al fallo AOL Argentina c/ GCBA (Gabriel Andres Campoli)
- Defending against the critic's curse (Glenn Langenburg)
- Del deber de sigilo y discreción en lo relativo a las actuaciones periciales. Mamá, yo quiero ser artista (Miguel Rodríguez Jouvencel) [Peritajemedicoforense.com]
- Deposition: Listening and answering (Steven Babitsky y James J. Mangravity)
- Develop credibility (and clients) through speaking (Rosalie Hamilton)
- Dynamic, energetic and dedicated (Ted E. Bumgardner)
- Effective expert and factual witness behavior: A guideline (Michael Decaire)
- Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence (William A. Tobin y William C. Thompson)
- Expert evaluation, controversial cases, and the media (William H. Reid) [J Psychiatric Practice, 2003]
- Expert qualifications & testimony (Paul C. Giannelli)
- Expert qualifications & testimony (Paul C. Giannelli) [Conference on Science and Law. San Diego, 1999]
- Expert witness may be sued (Mark C. Hunter)
- Expert witness testimony [Psychiatry.ca]
- Expert witness work offers challeges, rewards (Diane Mirel)
- Expert witnesses: Is justice ruined by expertism? (Bert Black et al)
- Experts and lawyer disqualification (Barry Zalma)
- Experts for sale? (Geoffrey Hichborn)
- Explaining evidence logically (Bernard Robertson y Tony Vignaux)
- Filing shines light on expert witness payments (Nathal Koppel)
- Flaws in forensic science. A house with no foundation (D. Michael Risinger y Michael J. Saks)
- Forensic anthropologists threatened in Guatemala [AAAS Human Rights Action Network]
- Forensic science education. Designing an effective curriculum. The Penn State Model (Mitchell Holland et al)
- Forensic scientist's salary: A real life CSI TV show [Salary Stories]
- Forensic scientists. A career in the crime lab (Hall Dillon)
- Forensic work and nonforensic clinicians. Part I (Willliam H. Reid)
- Forensic work and nonforensic clinicians. Part II: Reports and depositions (William H. Reid)
- Forensic work and nonforensic clinicians. Part III: Testifying in court (William H. Reid)
- Fundamentals of writting statements and reports (Scott David Neff)
- Gender bias in NFA-LD: An examination of participation rates and a content analysis of NFA-LD ballots (Susan Millsap y Scott Millsap)
- Hired gun - Does money or bias taint your expert? (Michael Welner y Elizabeth Delfs)
- Interpreting interpretation: The future of the art of oral interpretation in its most popular venue-forensics competition (Marion O. Rossi y Trischa Goodnow)
- Introduction to obtaining then preparing qualified documentation for your case (Scott David Neff)
- Kindred spirits? Pharmacists, doctors, and forensic scientists [Crime Lab Report]
- La idoneidad para actuar en calidad de perito y como tal exigencia a veces se olvida (Miguel Rodríguez Jouvencel)
- Legal and scientific scrutiny of forensic "sciences" and "experts" (H. O. E. Metz)
- Life whisperer, CFC formidable woman psychologist offers powerful lessons of life (Darrell Barr)
- Managing client expectations: Debunking the myths (J. Bradley Sargent)
- Mentoring: pay it forward (Ted E. Bumgardner)
- Murder & discovery standing the test of judicial review (Scott David Neff)
- One foot in, but both feet out (Lyle Coe)
- Organización de peritos en Colombia. Entrevista a Claudia Delgado Aguacia [Don Perito]
- Organization identity, culture and student motivation among intecollegiate forensic competitors (Stephen Croucher et al)
- Payment pitfalls endured by the expert who will be paid for services (Jess E. Dines)
- Perspective on observer effects in forensic science (Michael Risinger)
- Practice points (Denis M. deVlaming)
- Primary and rebuttal reports - The to and fro of legal battles (Mark C. Hughes)
- Private defense evaluations (Bruce Gross)
- Problems for experts (Barry Zalma)
- Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence (William C. Thompson y Simon A. Cole)
- Qualifications and paradigms for the independent examiner (John J. Haberstroh y Kevin Mulhern)
- Qualifying the expert witness: A practical voir dire (Gil L. Sapir)
- Recovery of damages due to lost profits (Richard M. Squar)
- Report on the Action Caucus on oral interpretation in forensic competition (Hal H. Holloway et al)
- Report writing and testimony (Mary Alice Conroy)
- Review of: How to write an expert witness report (Marcus Nashelsky) [J. Forensic Sci, 2018]
- Rules for giving your deposition [UM-St. Louis]
- Saving us from ourselves. Re-creating forensic science (Max M. Houck y Lawrence Quarino)
- Science, technical knowledge, and skill: Who is an "expert"? (Paul C. Giannelli et al)
- Scientific consensus and expert testimony: Lessons from the Judas Priest trial (Timothy E. Moore)
- Sea desabrido, camine con un bastón. Sobre tipos y estereotipos médicos en House (Amparo Guerra Gómez)
- Specialist curriculum for forensic pathology
- Speech and the public employee (Lisa Baker)
- Stories from the front: IE (IME) excess and how to counter them (John Haberstroh y Kevin Mulhern)
- Subic rape trial sparks war among forensic experts (Michael Punongbayan)
- Testimony before Texas State House of Representatives Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence Re: HB 614 (Michael Welner)
- The business of forensic consulting (Marc Rabinoff)
- The Daubert/Khumo implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion (Michael Risinger ey al)
- The expert witness: Knowledge and communication (The deadly or dynamic duo) (Debra Guiou Stufflebean)
- The expert witness. Courtroom communications (Maria V. Lyons)
- The flodbit problem: What are we doing? (Norah Rubin y Keith Inman)
- The language of forensic experts: A commentary on the Sally Clark case ]1999-2002 (Huda Benyounis) [Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2019]
- The place of narrative in the courtroom (Philip J. Candilis)
- The role of the forensic scientist in the new millenium with the example of fire debris analysis (Eric Stuffer)
- The success gap (Katie Donovan) {National Forensic Journal, 2012}
- The supreme court's trilogy on the admissibility of expert testimony (Margaret A. Berger)
- The top 19 things to remember when working with lawyers and courts (William H. Reid)
- Training - A strategy for success (Peter J. Abblett) {Problems of Forensic Sciences. 2001}
- Turning a blind eye to misleading scientific testimony: Failure of procedural safeguards in a capital case (William C. Thompson y Rachel Dioso-Villa)
- Two new cases important to experts (Barry Zalma)
- Unringing the bell: Expert witnesses and privilege (Richard A. Halloran)
- What does empathy have to do with forensics? (Ted E. Bumgardner)
- What jurors hear when DNA experts testify (Jay Koehler)
- What soda challenges and tennis balls can teach us about cognitive bias (Dana Delger) [Forensic Sci. International, 2019]
- When clinicians must testify in court (William H. Reid)
- Who says you can´t do it?. Gadgets (Dick Warrington)
- Why experts make errors (Itiel E. Dror y David Charlton)
- Why nonforensic clinicians should decline forensic referrals (William H. Reid)
- Working together: Examining forensic leadership through LMX theory (Ben Walker) {National Forensic Journal, 2013}
- Writing a winning CV for computer forensic vacancies (David Sullivan)
- Written reports: Guidance from SWGMAT (Maureen C. Bottrell)